<div align="right"><a style="background-color:black;color:white;text-decoration:none;padding:4px 6px;font-family:-apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "San Francisco", "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Ubuntu, Roboto, Noto, "Segoe UI", Arial, sans-serif;font-size:12px;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.2;display:inline-block;border-radius:3px;" href="https://unsplash.com/@zeak?utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=photographer-credit&utm_content=creditBadge" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" title="Download free do whatever you want high-resolution photos from Dmitrij Paskevic"><span style="display:inline-block;padding:2px 3px;"><svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" style="height:12px;width:auto;position:relative;vertical-align:middle;top:-1px;fill:white;" viewBox="0 0 32 32"><title>unsplash-logo</title><path d="M20.8 18.1c0 2.7-2.2 4.8-4.8 4.8s-4.8-2.1-4.8-4.8c0-2.7 2.2-4.8 4.8-4.8 2.7.1 4.8 2.2 4.8 4.8zm11.2-7.4v14.9c0 2.3-1.9 4.3-4.3 4.3h-23.4c-2.4 0-4.3-1.9-4.3-4.3v-15c0-2.3 1.9-4.3 4.3-4.3h3.7l.8-2.3c.4-1.1 1.7-2 2.9-2h8.6c1.2 0 2.5.9 2.9 2l.8 2.4h3.7c2.4 0 4.3 1.9 4.3 4.3zm-8.6 7.5c0-4.1-3.3-7.5-7.5-7.5-4.1 0-7.5 3.4-7.5 7.5s3.3 7.5 7.5 7.5c4.2-.1 7.5-3.4 7.5-7.5z"></path></svg></span><span style="display:inline-block;padding:2px 3px;">Dmitrij Paskevic</span></a>


Evidence is accumulating that demonstrates the important role of personal meaning in well-being and quality of life. This paper introduces a meaning-centered model of well-being consisting of three factors: positive affect, personal growth and reduction of negativity. I propose that a complete positive psychology of flourishing encompass three overlapping systems: (a) the three factors of welling-being, (b) the positive triad of resilience, and (c) the dual-system of managing approach and avoidance.

The Meaning of Meaning

A proper understanding of the relationship between meaning in life and well-being needs to distinguish between specific meaning and global meaning (Park & Folkman, 1997), situational meaning and ultimate meaning (Frankl, 1985), or situational meaning and existential meaning (Reker & Chamberlain, 2000; Reker & Wong, in press). In this paper, meaning in life refers to both situational meaning and existential meaning.

Reker and Wong (1988) define personal meaning as the “cognizance of order, coherence and purpose in one’s existence, the pursuit and attainment of worthwhile goals, and an accompanying sense of fulfillment” (p. 221). Wong (1989) defines personal meaning as a socially and individually constructed system, which endows life with personal significance. This meaning system includes five components: affective, motivational, cognitive, relational, and personal (i.e., personal characteristics and status in life (Wong, 1998).

According to Steger (in press), meaning in life consists of cognitive (comprehension) and motivational (purpose) components. Alternatively, meaning of life can be conceptualized as meeting four basic needs: purpose, efficacy or control, value and justification, and self-worth (Baumeister, 1991).

The Structure and Functions of Meaning

A comprehensive way to define meaning is in terms of the PURE model (Wong, 2010, 2011), which emphasizes the four essential components: Purpose, Understanding, Responsible action, and Enjoyment/Evaluation. Life would not be meaningful in the absence of any of these ingredients.

Functionally, these components entail the four major psychological processes for living the good life: motivational (purpose, life goals, needs), cognitive (understanding, making sense of life), social/moral (responsibility, accountability, commitment), and affective (enjoyment/evaluation, positive emotions).

Measures of Meaning in Life

The purpose dimension of meaning has been measured by the Purpose in Life scale (PIL; Crumbaugh & Maholick, 1969). The understanding dimension can be measured by the Sense of Coherence scale (SOC; Antonovsky, 1983). The Personal Meaning Profile (PMP) (Wong, 1998; McDonald, Wong, & Gingras, in press) measures overall level of meaning in life as well as sources of meaning.

The Life Regard Index (LRI; Battista and Almond, 1973) measures personal meaning independent of priori conceptions of the “true nature” of personal meaning. It consists of two subscales: the Framework scale measures whether an individual has the necessary framework for developing life goals; and the Fulfillment scale indicates the extent to which these goals are fulfilled. The Meaning in Life Questionnaire (MLQ; Steger, Frazier, Oishi, & Kaler, 2006) measures both the Presence of meaning and the Search for meaning. There is considerable evidence the above measures of meaning in life are related to well-being and mental health (Wong, in press b; Wong & Fry, 1998).Dimensions of Well-Being, Mental Health & Quality of Life

Dimensions of Well-Being, Mental Health & Quality of Life

Quality of life is often used as an umbrella concept covering the full range of the World Health Organization’s definition of health: “physical, psychological, and social well-being.” For example, Kane et al’s (2003) research on the self-report measures of quality of life for nursing home residents include comfort, functional competence, autonomy, dignity, individuality, privacy, relationships, meaningful activity, sense of security and safety, enjoyment, and spiritual well-being.

I propose that quality of life indicators need to include measures of subjective well-being and personal meaning. I want to make the case that a global index of quality of life needs to include some measures of meaning in life and subjective well-being. In other words, one cannot have a high quality of life devoid of meaning and purpose.

Different Types of Well-Being

Snyder and Lopez (2007) are correct in proposing the formula: Happiness + Meaning = Well-being. Diener (1984, 2000) uses the terms happiness and subjective well-being interchangeably, reflecting a hedonic perspective of subjective well-being. A eudaimonic perspective of subjective well-being focuses on meaning and virtue (Waterman, 1993; Ryan and Huta, 2009).

According to Ryff and Keyes (1995), psychological well-being is based on several dimensions: self-acceptance, personal growth, purpose in life, environmental mastery, autonomy, and positive relationships with others. These dimensions cover much of the same domain as sources of meaning (Wong, 1998). According to Keyes (1998), social well-being consists of five dimensions: social integration, social contribution, coherence, actualization, and acceptance. Complete mental health includes emotional, social, and psychological well-being (Keyes & Magyar-Moe, 2003) in addition to the absence of mental illness symptoms (Keyes & Lopez, 2002).

Spiritual well-being as measured by the Spiritual Well-being Scale (SWBS; Paloutzian & Ellison, 1982) measures subjective and highly personal aspects of life. It consists of the Existential and the Spiritual subscales: the former is the quest for personal meaning, while the latter is about one’s relationship with God. Research has shown that the SWBS is also a useful indicator of global health and well-being because it is related to physical, psychological, and relational well-being (Ellison & Smith, 1991).

Recently, Seligman (2011) proposed a five-component model using the acronym PERMA: positive emotion, engagement, meaning, accomplishment, and relationship. This model encompasses both hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Seligman’s PERMA is an extension of his earlier conception of authentic happiness (2002). However, the emphasis of PERMA is still happiness-oriented rather than meaning-oriented as differentiated by Wong (2011).

Most of the above models on well-being include a component of meaning and purpose. The present meaning-oriented approach makes meaning the overarching framework for well-being and mental health. Wong’s model emphasizes the PURE model as well as the eight sources of meaning: positive emotion, achievement, relationship, intimacy, religion/spirituality, self-transcendence, self-acceptance, and fairness/social justice (Wong, 1998). For individuals with a meaning mindset, their pursuit of well-being emphasizes meaning and virtue not just for themselves but also for humanity. Even in the absence of positive affect and active engagement, one can still enjoy certain levels of well-being based on meaning, virtue and spirituality. According to Haybron (2000), “pleasure does not really matter all that much in itself, being merely a by-product that accompanies the achievement of what is truly worthwhile” (p. 20).

The Role of Meaning in Enhancing Quality of Life

I propose that meaning serves at least three important functions: (a) meaning as a contributor to well-being, (b) meaning as a protective and preventive factor, and (c) meaning as the basis for hope in hopeless situations. This three-factor theory is depicted in Figure 1. I also examine meaning as an outcome measure of well-being.

Sources of Meaning as Contributors to Well-Being

Numerous studies have linked meaning in life with positive affect and life satisfaction (Chamberlain & Zika, 1988; King, Hicks, Krull, & Del Gaiso, 2006; Ryff, 1989; Zika & Chamberlain, 1992). More recent research has shown that the Meaning in Life Questionnaire (MLQ; Steger et al., 2006) and the Life Regard Index (LRI; Battista and Almond, 1973) are also related to a variety of well-being and mental health measures (Steger, in press; Debats, 1998).

Sources of meaning as measured by Wong (1998) are related to both presence of well-being and absence of mental illness. Mascaro (2006) found that a sense of personal meaning as measured by the Personal Meaning Profile (PMP; Wong, 1998) was negatively related to depressive symptoms, depression and hopelessness, and positively related to meaning fulfillment, hope, and internal locus of control. A Dutch translation of the PMP administered to cancer patients was found to be positively correlated with psychological well-being and negatively correlated to distress (Jaarsma, Pool, Ranchor, & Sanderman, 2007). Simms’ (2005) research found that mental health and well-being consists of five main factors: personal meaning, subjective well-being, personal growth, hardiness, and positive relationship.

Although all these studies are correlational, there are some perspectives and longitudinal studies which show that meaning can predict future well-being (Mascaro, 2006; Mascaro & Rosen, 2008). Ideally, experimental studies are needed to more clearly demonstrate how various sources of meaning contribute to well-being.

Meaning as a Protective/Preventive Factor

When things are going well and people are enjoying pleasant, engaging, and successful activities, positive emotions are probably sufficient to sustain a high level of subjective well-being. Research has clearly demonstrated the health benefits of positive affect (Fredrickson, 2001; Lyubormirsky, 2007). However, when people are going through very difficult times, meaning, rather than positive emotions, becomes more important in maintaining some level of well-being (Frankl, 1985; Wong, 2010, 2011).

According to the meaning-centered approach to well-being, the ABCDE strategy serves the function of transforming negatives into positives, as well as making suffering more bearable. The ABCDE acronym stands for acceptance, belief, commitment, discovery, and evaluation/enjoyment. I have given a detailed account on how these components contribute to resilience and well-being in adverse situations (Wong, 2010; Wong & Wong, in press).

Meaning can contribute to effective coping and reduction of stress through several pathways. First, adaptive attribution and explanation can contribute to hope and success (Seligman, 1990; Weiner, 1985; Wong & Weiner, 1981). Second, existential coping strategies such as acceptance and seeing the positive potential of negative events are important in coping with situations beyond our control (Wong, Reker, & Peacock, 2006). Third, having a clear sense of meaning and purpose contributes to the will to live in extreme situations (Frankl, 1985; Wong, 2009). Fourth, Wong’s (1993; Wong, Reker, & Peacock, 2006) resource congruence model also emphasizes the importance of preventive coping in terms of cultivating coping resources.

There is a vast literature on the importance of appraisal and meaning in effective coping and stress reduction (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984; Wong & Wong, 2006). For example, Debats, Drost, and Hansen (1995) found that the LRI was positively correlated with effective coping with stressful life events in the past. In short, meaning serves two important functions: protecting one’s well-being through effective coping, and enhancing one’s well-being through meaning reconstruction and the development of psychological resources.

Meaning as the Basis for Hope in Extreme Situations

The important role of hope in maintaining one’s well-being and health has been well documented (Snyder, 2000). Hope provides the motivation to strive and improve one’s life. However, in extreme situations such as the Holocaust, being trapped 3,000 feet underground, or dying from incurable cancer, one needs a different kind of hope that is not based on confidence in one’s own competence or positive expectations of a good outcome. Viktor Frankl (1985) developed the concept of tragic optimism which enabled him to survive the Nazi death camps. I have identified the key components of tragic optimism as consisting of acceptance, affirmation, faith in God, self-transcendence, and courage. Only meaning-oriented hope can survive unimaginable horrors and sufferings.

Meaning as an Outcome Measure

I have already argued that meaning needs to be included as part of the global measures of well-being and quality of life. The obvious reason is that positive emotions tend to lead to the perception of meaning (King & Hicks, in press). Another reason is that individuals who pursue meaningful and virtuous life goals can still achieve some level of satisfaction and well-being in spite of hardships and suffering (Frankl, 1985; Haybron, 2000; Wong, 2011).

A Meaning-Centered Model of Well-Being and Mental Health

A meaning-centered approach to well-being and mental health will consist of three factors as depicted in Figure 1. The first factor refers to meaning as an outcome or meaning-based positive emotion. As such, it will contribute to flourishing like any other positive emotion as predicted by Fredrickson’s (2001) broaden-and-build model of positive emotion.

The second factor refers to the beneficial effects of pursuing the eight sources of personal meaning according to Wong (1998) in enhancing personal growth, psychological, social and emotional well-being as defined by Ryff and Keyes (1995; Keyes & Lopez, 2002; Keyes & Magyar-Moe, 2003).

The third factor refers to the reduction and transformation of negativity based on the deep-and-wide theory of the meaning-centered ABCDE intervention (Wong, in press a, 2010). The deep-and-wide theory posits that repeated encounters with obstacles will compel one to dig deeper into one’s inner resources and explore more broadly for solutions and options. I have provided some empirical support for this theory elsewhere (Wong, 1979, 1995). The third factor contributes to resilience and reduction of mental illness symptoms. Together, these three factors contribute to complete mental health as defined by Keyes and Lopez (2002).

Meaning Management Theory of Resilience & Flourishing

Meaning management refers to how we manage our inner lives, such as feelings, desires, perceptions, thoughts, and interpretation of life experiences. The quality of one’s inner life depends on how we manage the basic processes of meaning, meaning-seeking, meaning-making, and meaning-reconstruction (Wong, 2007). Thus, it is a meaning-centered self-regulation or self-determination theory.Meaning management consists of regulating two overlapping systems: the three-factor model of well-being described earlier, and the positive triad of resilience described elsewhere (Wong & Wong, in press). In addition, meaning management involves the dual-system model responsible for managing the interactions between approach and avoidance; the dual-system is involved in both the protection of well-being and the enhancement of resilience.

Meaning management consists of regulating two overlapping systems: the three-factor model of well-being described earlier, and the positive triad of resilience described elsewhere (Wong & Wong, in press). In addition, meaning management involves the dual-system model responsible for managing the interactions between approach and avoidance; the dual-system is involved in both the protection of well-being and the enhancement of resilience.In view of the above analysis, meaning should be part of any indices of global measurements of well-being and quality of life. Also, intervention programs to improve the quality of life need to incorporate meaning-enhancing exercises and activities. Finally, more research is needed to understand the meaning-management processes in living a healthy and fulfilling life.

In view of the above analysis, meaning should be part of any indices of global measurements of well-being and quality of life. Also, intervention programs to improve the quality of life need to incorporate meaning-enhancing exercises and activities. Finally, more research is needed to understand the meaning-management processes in living a healthy and fulfilling life.


  1. Antonovsky, A. (1983). The sense of coherence: Development of a research instrument. Newsletter and Research Report of the W. S. Schwartz Research Center for Behavioral Medicine, 1, 11-22.
  2. Battista, J., & Almond, R. (1973). The development of meaning in life. Psychiatry, 36, 409-427.
  3. Baumeister, R. F. (1991). Meanings of life. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  4. Chamberlain, K., & Zika, S. (1988). Religiosity, life meaning, and wellbeing: Some relationships in a sample of women. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 27, 411-420.
  5. Crumbaugh, J. C., & Maholick, L. T. (1969). Manual of instructions for the purpose in life test. Munster, IN: Psychometric Affiliates.
  6. Debats, D. L. (1998). Measurement of personal meaning: The psychometric properties of the life regard index. In P. T. P. Wong & P. Fry (Eds.), The human quest for meaning: A handbook of psychological research and clinical applications (pp. 111-140). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  7. Debats, D. L., Drost, J., & Hansen, P. (1995). Experiences of meaning in life: A combined qualitative and quantitative approach. British Journal of Psychology, 86, 359-375.
  8. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542-575.
  9. Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55, 34-43.
  10. Ellison, C. W., & Smith, J. (1991). Toward an integrative measure of health and well-being. Journal of Psychology and Theology: Special Issue, 19(1), 35-48.
  11. Frankl, V. E. (1985). Man’s search for meaning (Revised & updated ed.). New York, NY: Washington Square Press/Pocket Books.
  12. Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions of positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56, 218-226.
  13. Haybron, D. M. (2000). Two philosophical problems in the study of happiness. The Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 207-225.
  14. Jaarsma, T. A., Pool, G., Ranchor, A. V., & Sanderman, R. (2007). The concept and measurement of meaning in life in Dutch cancer patients. Psycho-Oncology, 16, 241-248.
  15. Kane, R. A., Kling, K. C., Bershadsky, B., Kane, R. L., Giles, K., Degenholtz, H. B., Liu, J., & Cutler, L. J. (2003). Quality of life measures for nursing home residents. Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences, 58A(3), 240-248.
  16. Keyes, C. L. M. (1998). Social well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 121-140.
  17. Keyes, C. L. M., & Lopez, S. J. (2002). Toward a science of mental health: Positive directions in diagnosis and interventions. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 45-62). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  18. Keyes, C. L. M., & Magyar-Moe, J. L. (2003). The measurement and utility of adult subjective well-being. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Positive psychological assessment: A handbook of models and measures (pp. 411-426). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  19. King, L. A., & Hicks, J. A. (in press). Positive affect and meaning in life: The intersection of hedonism and eudaimonia. In P. T. P. Wong (Ed.), The human quest for meaning: Theories, research, and applications (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
  20. King, L. A., Hicks, J. A., Krull, J. L., & Del Gaiso, A. K. (2006). Positive affect and the experience of meaning in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 179-196.
  21. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York, NY: Springer.
  22. Lyubomirsky, S. (2007). The how of happiness: A scientific approach to getting the life you want. New York, NY: Penguin.
  23. Mascaro, N. (2006). Longitudinal analysis of the relationship of existential meaning with depression and hope. Doctoral Dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.
  24. Mascaro, N., & Rosen, D. H. (2008). Assessment of existential meaning and its longitudinal relations with depressive symptoms. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 27(6), 576-599.
  25. McDonald, M. J., Wong, P. T. P., & Gingras, D. T. (in press). Meaning-in-life measures and development of a brief version of the Personal Meaning Profile. In P. T. P. Wong (Ed.), The human quest for meaning: Theories, research, and applications (2nd ed., pp. 357-382). New York, NY: Routledge.
  26. Paloutzian, R. F., & Ellison, C. W. (1982). Loneliness, spiritual well being and the quality of life. In L.A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy. New York, NY: Wiley.
  27. Park, C. L, & Folkman, S. (1997). Meaning in the context of stress and coping. General Review of Psychology, 1, 115-144.
  28. Reker, G. T., & Chamberlain, K. (Eds.). (2000). Exploring existential meaning: Optimizing human development across the life span. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Reker, G. T., & Wong, P. T. P. (2012).
  29. Reker, G. T., & Wong, P. T. P. (in press). Personal meaning in life and psychosocial adaptation in the later years. In P. T. P. Wong (Ed.), The human quest for meaning: Theories, research, and applications (2nd ed., pp. 433-456). New York, NY: Routledge.
  30. Reker, G. T., & Wong, P. T. P. (1988). Towards a theory of personal meaning. In J. E. Birren, & V. L. Bengston (Eds.), Emergent theories of aging (pp. 214-246). New York, NY: Springer.
  31. Ryan, R. M., & Huta, V. (2009). Wellness as health functioning or wellness as happiness: The importance of eudaimonic thinking. Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 202-204.
  32. Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations of the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069-1081.
  33. Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719-727.
  34. Seligman, M. E. (1990). Learned optimism. New York, NY: Knopf.
  35. Seligman, M. E. (2002). Authentic happiness. New York, NY: Free Press.
  36. Seligman, M. E. (2011). Flourish. New York, NY: Free Press.
  37. Simms, S. M. (2005). Making lemonade out of life’s lemons: Factors of mental health and well-being. Unpublished master’s thesis, Trinity Western University, Langley, BC, Canada.
  38. Snyder, C. R. (Ed.). (2000). Handbook of hope: Theory, measures, and applications. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  39. Snyder, C. R., & Lopez, S. J. (2007). Positive psychology: The scientific and practical explorations of human strengths. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  40. Steger, M. F. (in press). Experiencing meaning in life: Optimal functioning at the nexus of well-being, psychopathology, and spirituality. In P. T. P. Wong (Ed.), The human quest for meaning: Theories, research, and applications (2nd ed,). New York, NY: Routledge.
  41. Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S., & Kaler, M. (2006). The meaning in life questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 30-93.
  42. Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaemonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 678-691.
  43. Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548-573.
  44. Wong, P. T. P. (in press-a). A dual-system model of what makes life worth living. In P. T. P. Wong (Ed.), The human quest for meaning: Theories, research, and applications (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
  45. Wong, P. T. P. (Ed.). (in press-b). The human quest for meaning: Theories, research, and applications (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
  46. Wong, P. T. P. (1979). Frustration, exploration, and learningCanadian Psychological Review, 20, 133-144.
  47. Wong, P. T. P. (1989). Personal meaning and successful agingCanadian Psychology, 30, 516-525.
  48. Wong, P. T. P. (1993). Effective management of life stress: The resource-congruence modelStress Medicine, 9, 51-60.
  49. Wong, P. T. P. (1995). A stage model of coping with frustrative stress. In R. Wong (Ed.), Biological perspectives on motivated activities (pp. 339-378). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  50. Wong, P. T. P. (1998). Implicit theories of meaningful life and the development of the Personal Meaning Profile (PMP). In P. T. P. Wong, & P. Fry (Eds.), The human quest for meaning: A handbook of psychological research and clinical applications (pp. 111-140). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  51. Wong, P. T. P. (2008). Meaning-management theory and death acceptance. In A. Tomer, G. T. Eliason, & P. T. P. Wong (Eds.), Existential and spiritual issues in death attitudes (pp. 65-87). New York, NY: Erlbaum.
  52. Wong, P. T. P. (2009). Viktor Frankl: Prophet of hope for the 21st century. In A. Batthyany, & J. Levinson (Eds.), Existential psychotherapy of meaning: Handbook of logotherapy and existential analysis. Phoenix, AZ: Zeig, Tucker & Theisen. (Early version available here.)
  53. Wong, P. T. P. (2010). Meaning therapy: An integrative and positive existential psychotherapyJournal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 40(2), 85-99.
  54. Wong, P. T. P. (2011). Positive psychology 2.0: Towards a balanced interactive model of the good life. Canadian Psychology, 52(2), 69-81.
  55. Wong, P. T. P., & Fry, P. S. (Eds.). (1998). The human quest for meaning: A handbook of psychological research and clinical applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  56. Wong, P. T. P., & Weiner, B. (1981). When people ask “Why” questions and the heuristic of attributional searchJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 650-663.
  57. Wong, P. T. P., & Wong, L. C. J. (in press). A meaning-centered approach to building youth resilience. In P. T. P. Wong (Ed.), The human quest for meaning: Theories, research, and applications (2nd ed., pp. 585-617). New York, NY: Routledge.
  58. Wong, P. T. P., & Wong, L. C. J. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of multicultural perspectives on stress and coping. New York, NY: Springer.
  59. Wong, P. T. P., Reker, G. T. & Peacock, E. (2006). The resource-congruence model of coping and the development of the Coping Schema Inventory. In P. T. P. Wong, & L. C. J., Wong (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural perspectives on stress and coping (pp. 223-283). New York, NY: Springer.
  60. Zika, S., & Chamberlain, K. (1992). On the relation between meaning in life and psychological well-being. British Journal of Psychology, 83, 133-145.


Shorter version published as Wong, P. T. P. (2014). Meaning in life. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 3894-3898). New York, NY: Springer.